Strengthening rural communities
About Us
Current Issues
Publications
Calendar
Women in Farming Groups
Access Homehealth
Accommodation
Bursaries and Scholarships
Business Directory

Links

Contact Us

 

Submissions

30 August 2005

 

 

Product Stewardship Submissions

Ministry for the Environment

PO Box 10362

Wellington

 

Rural Women New Zealand Submission on Product Stewardship and Water Efficiency Labelling

 

1   Rural Women New Zealand (RWNZ) appreciates the opportunity to provide comments on the discussion document Product Stewardship and Water Efficiency Labelling – new tools to reduce waste.

 

2   RWNZ supports the preferred approach for product stewardship schemes (Option 4) – a mix of voluntary and regulatory approaches.

 

3   The following comments have been provided by members to the questions in section 6 of the Product Stewardship Section of the document:

  

•  Priority product areas for product stewardship schemes include cars, electronic products, hazardous substances, tyres (assuming the tracking system does not fully address the issue) as these have been highlighted in the document as having particular management and disposal problems (high volume and harm). The huge amounts of packaging currently ending up in landfills is one issue that everyone can immediately participate in and progress has already been made with the Packaged Goods Accord. (High volume and achievable).

 

2 The criteria included in the NZ Waste Management Strategy (section 5.2 of

discussion document) provide clear guidance as to involvement in particular product stewardship schemes.

 

•  The Ministry can play an important role in facilitating product stewardship schemes (as in the Packaged Goods Accord) and can provide the back stop regulation for high priority wastes where there is a clear need for intervention. Monitoring the performance of schemes is a vital role for the Ministry, including enforcement of any regulation.

 

•  The use of a range of tools such as deposit-refund schemes are available for

product stewardship schemes but the use of any particular tools should not be mandatory. The development of voluntary schemes needs flexibility.

 

•  In considering costs members think that disposal costs may fit well with the producer and travel with the product to disposal. Consumers should be advised as part of labeling as to the disposal component of the cost. This could encourage return/refund schemes and should encourage producers to minimize the costs of disposal to remain competitive.

 

•  Consumer education regarding packaging, recycling is important. Many people want to do the right thing but are not aware of all the implications of their decisions to purchase certain products. For example it is understood that there is a better market for recycling aluminium cans than glass and therefore consumers may choose to purchase cans where possible if this is known.

In a country with a small population and large distances for collection for recycling there are always going to be cost effectiveness considerations. Therefore the minimization of waste and good consumer choices is important.

 

Rural people face particular problems with disposal of waste given the large distances involved in transport. In particular the disposal of unwanted hazardous substances (chemical sprays etc) is difficult. The safe disposal of such items off farm will become increasingly important for overseas markets for produce. A component built into the product price that covered the collection of this material may be cost effective. It was noted by one member that if they were to dispose of everything correctly they would be transporting dangerous goods back to town. Their neighbours throw everything into a rubbish hole and then light a fire. While education will assist in ensuring people are more aware of the issues, any scheme has to be easy to comply with and not onerously expensive.

 

 

4   Water Efficiency Labelling

While labelling of appliances with water efficiency rating is supported it is not considered necessary to be mandatory. Many of the New Zealand manufactures sell to Australia and vice versa. Australia has a much greater need for water efficiency than New Zealand and therefore it is considered in the manufacturer's interest to label for water efficiency as a marketing strategy.

 

In response to specific questions:

 

14   Members are influenced in purchasing whiteware and plumbing by water efficiency labelling.

 

•  A New Zealand –based administration option is preferred.

 

  19 Advice to consumers regarding the benefits of water efficiency without

    compromising the end result (eg washing clothes).

 

 

Yours faithfully,

 

 

 

 

Maggie Bayfield

Executive Officer

 

 

Members' Area

Members who wish to enter the Members Only area of this site should contact enquiries@ruralwomen.org.nz to request the username and password

 

 

© Rural Women New Zealand 1999-2007

Website design by Donna Russell, E-builders NZ Ltd